This is not an attempt to claim or assume any authority on Newsvine, and should not be construed as such. Rather, it is written with the goal of clarifying what I see everyday - misconceptions about the meaning and application of the First Article of the Newsvine Code of Honor. Lastly, I had to write this, as I was cajoled into doing so by a couple of Newsviners - and an Irishman such as myself simply cannot say no to the ladies. It's genetically impossible.
First, some background. I was a beta viner, meaning I was here before Newsvine was opened to the public. During the beta phase things worked differently than they do now. Newsvine was bare bones - there were no threaded comments, comments were not editable, there were no images, no AP feed, no comment tracker, no groups, no friend lists, no watchlists, no reporting functions, no customizable modules, no Code of Honor...not much of anything, really.
So what did we have? A solid infrastructure, a great team of programmers, and a staff that was wide open to suggestions, and asked for our help in building a new kind of website, led by the visionary Calvin Tang.
In discussing the features we would like to see (and never see) a suggestion was made that maybe, just maybe, we should have some rules. Like all suggestions, it was met with some resistance, but the general consensus won out. We knew that once opened to the public this place would grow, and some of the new people might not share our vision, so we got to work writing a basic set of rules to govern the site. The debate ran across many user columns, in discussions which I was unable to locate, and on the Newsvine Blog.
Because the intention was always debate with honor, we deemed it the Code of Honor. Creative huh?
In January of 2006, Calvin, um, I mean the Newsvine Blog, opened a thread asking for suggestions. This is that thread. The first mention of what eventually became CoH1 seems to have been made by Mykola Bilokonsky, who incidentally is also the Viner who came up with the concept of Groups, for which he was awarded an RAV. Myk still shows up now and then, so if you see him, say thanks. Twice.
Here is the portion of this comment to which I'm referring:
The following month, the first revision of the Code Of Honor was complete, and put up for the review of the community, by Calvin, um, the Newsvine Blog. That article is here. If you read that thread, you'll see that there is not a single objection to the first article of the Code of Honor.
Though the wording had changed, the intent remained the same. The first article was simply a reworded version of Mykola's suggestion, and was presented thusly:
- Above all else, respect others. If you see disrespectful behavior, report it, rather than engaging in a war of disrespect. Users who are repeatedly reported as disrespectful will lose the ability to add content and comments to Newsvine.
It was then boiled down even further, to simply state the following:
1. Above all else, respect others. If you see disrespectful behavior, report it, rather than further inflaming the situation.
The Code of Honor went live on February 14, 2006, about a month before the site went public. It remained unchanged for two years, until the first (and only) revision of the entire code. That revision was necessary for two reasons: to clarify several of the points of the existing CoH, and to address some previously unforeseen issues. After much debate on threads such as this, this, and this, and many others which I was unable to locate, the revised code went into effect on March 28, 2008, and is still in effect today.
Coh1 is has since been stated thusly:
Above all else, respect others. Address issues and arguments and refrain from making personal attacks. If you see something disrespectful or inappropriate, report it - rather than further inflaming the situation. More +
- Adding a personal attack to an otherwise valuable comment or article serves only to render that contribution invalid in its entirety. Such content is subject to moderation.
- Harassment and/or intimidation of others on Newsvine will not be tolerated, and patterns of such behavior may result in account cancelation.
Now, to the point. What does it actually mean?
Many people seem to get hung up on the first sentence, which commands that we respect others. Respect, however is a subjective term. What is disrespectful to one person is perfectly acceptable to others. For the purpose of the CoH, and throughout all the revisions, respect has been used to mean respecting the opinions of other newsviners, and not denigrating those users simply because you might disagree with them. It's always been meant to be taken as a whole with the next sentence - that of addressing issues and arguments, and refraining from personal attacks.
Newsvine is not a tea party nor a church social. No one expects Viners to call each other Sir or Ma'am, or to lift their little finger as they sip their tea. You are only asked, or rather required, to be civil towards each other, and not call each other by insulting, pejorative names. As the code says, attack issues and arguments and refrain from making personal attacks.
That is exactly what Myk Bilokonsky said in his original suggestion, so long ago:
please refrain from ad hominim attacks - keep on the subject, don't get personal.
Over time, the wording changed. The meaning, however, did not. CoH 1 also details the proper procedure for dealing with ad hominem attacks should the occur.
If you see something disrespectful or inappropriate, report it - rather than further inflaming the situation.
Simply put, do not respond. Instead, report the infraction, and move on.
And so, to conclude: Never insult another Viner, and if you see a Viner insulted, do not respond, even if you are that Viner. Simply click "inflammatory," and move on. In doing so the incidence of flame wars will be cut drastically, and the moderators will be better able to do their jobs.